|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: SAX (Introduction, Recomandations, Future...)
In an environment such as the internet provides, there are countless forums to participate in. And countless technologies under development. In this environment, the democratic input may be in choosing which forums and technologies to participate in. "Voting with your feet", as it were. Where there is strong leadership, it is possible to avoid the flaws endemic with "design by committee." Agreement means continued support and contributions to the agenda at hand. And an insensitivity to significant points of merit ultimately means the reformation into another forum where there is such sensitivity. One consequence of this is that forums will tend to be most active in areas where the recognized leaders are most competent. Activities where the leadership only believes it is competent will not receive the same broad support. Bill From: Len Bullard <cbullard@h...> To: <haustein@k...> Cc: <xml-dev@x...> Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2000 9:47 AM Subject: Re: SAX (Introduction, Recomandations, Future...) > Stefan Haustein wrote: > > > > > > Democracy > > > >does not exclude delegation of final decisions to an appropiate person. > > > > > > Oh how deliciously ironic ;) > > > > Ok, I should have said > > > > democracy does not exclude delegtion of decisions for a limited time > > period. > > You are probably looking at a Republic, not a democracy, but your > point is well taken. The limits of these are the duration of > conversation, the inclusiveness or exclusiveness of membership, > voting rights, and the size of a consenting majority required > to decide and close a debate. > > len > >
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








