[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: ANN: SAX 2.0 extension proposals.

• From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>
• To: David Megginson <david@m...>
• Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 19:51:34 -0800

David Megginson wrote:
> 
> David Brownell writes:
> 
>  > Naturally I don't have too much objection to this, though I'd like
>  > to see the standard factory naming convention (createX, not makeX).
> 
> Done (in beta2).

Thanks!!


>  > However, I do wonder what you think about the fact that this will
>  > need to run in environments where calls like System.getProperty()
>  > aren't allowed, or which may not support dynamic loading.
> 
> I put a warning in the JavaDoc.  It's amazing how many bugs that can
> fix.

Doesn't really address the problem.  What you did is basically say
that it can't run in such environments ... that is, that in any sort
of secure component container, there's no standard way for components
to get a SAX parser.

- Dave

***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/threads.html
***************************************************************************

• References:
  • RE: ANN: SAX 2.0 extension proposals.
    • From: Miles Sabin <msabin@c...>
  • Re: ANN: SAX 2.0 extension proposals.
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>
  • Re: ANN: SAX 2.0 extension proposals.
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>
  • Re: ANN: SAX 2.0 extension proposals.
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: ANN: SAX 2.0 extension proposals.
• Next by Date: Re: org.xml.sax.ContentHandler conflicts with java.net.ContentHandler
• Previous by thread: Re: ANN: SAX 2.0 extension proposals.
• Next by thread: RE: ANN: SAX 2.0 extension proposals.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread