Re: Alternatives to the W3C
At Thursday 1/20/00 03:47 PM -0500, Tyler Baker wrote: >directly. A lot of people complain about why it has taken so long for >Netscape to include >XSL support, and all I can say to them is "you get what you pay for". One >browser or two >browsers or three browsers or four, it really does not matter because the >incentive to >innovate with web browsers is no more. "Free" browsers aren't guaranteed to last forever, any more than "free" razors or "free" salt pretzels in a bar. They're marketing "giveaways" designed to sell products. Given that Microsoft may or may not be here in a recognizable form in the fairly near future, it doesn't seem safe to count too many chickens based on continuing Microsoft dominance of the browser market either. IBM used to *own* the computing world, and it's now quite possible to spend months or years as a computer programmer without even hearing their name mentioned. The most recent competitive strategy of giving away browsers was based on the fact that they have the potential to eliminate most or all of the operating system user interface and sell back ends based on their integration with back end products. Both Microsoft and Netscape used to charge for their browser products, remember? Netscape was targeting the Windows GUI as well as the NT Server market and Microsoft reacted with free and then "integrated" browsers built into the OS. There are still browser makers selling browsers (e.g. Opera) based on feature sets, even within standards and in the face of "free" competition. Have you looked at the future plans and developments documents at W3C lately? There really does seem to be a grand and powerful vision there and the various XML-related standards have the potential to supercede *much* of the proprietary stuff the browser makers have done in the past and will do in the near future. Whether anyone agrees or not, hand-held devices will be browsing the Web in great numbers in the near future. XML and related standards make that possible. Look at the history of radio, which is almost a non-issue nowadays except in portable devices. Not everyone has no life away from their 17 inch monitor and really wants to surf the Web like early radio listeners spent hours glued to their custom consoles by headphone cords. Standards don't mean that innovation stops any more than standardizing on using SAE (or metric) bolts, four rubber wheels, a gas pedal, and a steering wheel as the basis for an automobile means that we're all still driving Model T Fords. The Model T was made possible by standardization, and quickly surpassed custom-made cars within a few years. That doesn't mean that custom car makers are out of business; there are probably more custom car makers now than there ever were. But how many people do you know who own one? The problem with browsers has been that heretofore the browser makers have been inventing their own nuts and bolts, so the tool kits of every designer have had to include tools to deal with all of them at great expense. While this is typical of an immature industry, standardization quickly drives custom solutions to the edge of the marketplace rather than the center. If you look at the history of tools, *real* innovations and improvements in productivity have followed quickly on standardization. When SAE (and metric) nut and bolt sizes were agreed upon, socket sets and air wrenches followed because they were newly possible. Before that you had the choice of adjustable wrenches or custom wrenches designed for the particular item and that was it. A socket was too expensive to build when it only fit one nut and an air wrench needs sockets to be practical. Programming languages have the same history; the first were designed to fit one machine and one machine only. The current software industry owes everything to standard languages which hide the details of the machine and enable the designer to concentrate on function and real innovation, not how many registers are available and whether a conditional branch can be made within the limits of a near jump. There are an enormous number of innovations that a browser maker can make *within* the parameters of standards processes that can make life easier and more fun for users, just like automobile manufacturers compete on the basis of style, power, image, economy, and the hundred other tangible and intangible benefits that the customer sees in choosing a BMW over a Lexus, or a Jeep Cherokee over a Hummer. But one of the many things a user *doesn't* have to decide is whether their local auto mechanic has a wrench that will fit the spark plugs, whether they prefer a steering wheel or a tiller, and whether they're able to use the highways designed for Fords or Chevrolets. xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 Unsubscribe by posting to majordom@i... the message unsubscribe xml-dev (or) unsubscribe xml-dev your-subscribed-email@your-subscribed-address Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format