Re: SAX2: Which license?
Paul Prescod wrote: > > If this is worth doing then the way I would propose to do it would > be to tie the trademark to a test suite. Which is what Sun is doing with its standard extensions; there's at least one precedent beyond POSIX certification. FWIW I'm more than willing to hear about issues people may have in the SAX-1.0/XML-1.0 test harness I've written (on my XML page), and would be interested in any enhancements folk have that can promote SAX-2.0 conformance testing. Fair notice: those aren't the only standards that'll be involved in such work. And of course, since it's Open Source it can be used without my active involvement too. (Though I'd love to hear about it before anyone starts!) - Dave xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; unsubscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format