Re: a case in OASIS test suite
In article <037a01bf6990$a1a95720$80f5a8c0@2...>, Takuki Kamiya <kamiya@r...> wrote: >E34 seems to conclude that it is now legitimately made to be a well- >formedness constraint by saying that: > >"the Name given in the entity reference must match that in an entity > declaration that does not occur within the external subset or a > parameter entity." Yes, I misread it. This seems to mean that a non-validating parser that reads the external subset even when standalone="yes" must perform a check when expanding entities to see where they were declared. What is the status of a document like this: <?xml version="1.0" standalone="yes"?> <!DOCTYPE foo [ <!ENTITY % pe "<!ENTITY e 'hello'>"> %pe; ]> <foo>&e;</foo> &e; refers to a declaration that occurs in a parameter entity, so it is not well-formed. Or did they mean "external parameter entity"? There seems to be a typo in the Rationale for this erratum. The second sentence contrasts a processor that doesn't read the external subset with one that (also) doesn't. -- Richard -- Spam filter: to mail me from a .com/.net site, put my surname in the headers. "The Internet is really just a series of bottlenecks joined by high speed networks." - Sam Wilson xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 Unsubscribe by posting to majordom@i... the message unsubscribe xml-dev (or) unsubscribe xml-dev your-subscribed-email@your-subscribed-address Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format