[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: a case in OASIS test suite

• From: richard@c... (Richard Tobin)
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: 28 Jan 2000 14:21:16 GMT

In article <037a01bf6990$a1a95720$80f5a8c0@2...>,
Takuki Kamiya <kamiya@r...> wrote:
>E34 seems to conclude that it is now legitimately made to be a well-
>formedness constraint by saying that:
>
>"the Name given in the entity reference must match that in an entity
> declaration that does not occur within the external subset or a
> parameter entity."

Yes, I misread it.

This seems to mean that a non-validating parser that reads the
external subset even when standalone="yes" must perform a check
when expanding entities to see where they were declared.

What is the status of a document like this:

<?xml version="1.0" standalone="yes"?>
<!DOCTYPE foo [
<!ENTITY % pe "<!ENTITY e 'hello'>">
%pe;
]>
<foo>&e;</foo>

&e; refers to a declaration that occurs in a parameter entity, so it
is not well-formed.  Or did they mean "external parameter entity"?

There seems to be a typo in the Rationale for this erratum.  The
second sentence contrasts a processor that doesn't read the external
subset with one that (also) doesn't.

-- Richard
-- 
Spam filter: to mail me from a .com/.net site, put my surname in the headers.

"The Internet is really just a series of bottlenecks joined by high
speed networks." - Sam Wilson

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Unsubscribe by posting to majordom@i... the message
unsubscribe xml-dev  (or)
unsubscribe xml-dev your-subscribed-email@your-subscribed-address

Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.

• References:
  • Re: a case in OASIS test suite
    • From: "Takuki Kamiya" <kamiya@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Seeking a Dao of Groves
• Next by Date: Re: Call for unifying and clarifying XML 1.0, DOM, XPATH, and XML Infoset
• Previous by thread: Re: a case in OASIS test suite
• Next by thread: Re: a case in OASIS test suite
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread