Peter Murray-Rust wrote: <snip size="huge"/> >I think we have an opportunity here. Is there a role for (say) XML-DEV >whitepapers? SAX, XSchema, DDML, and SML could fall into this category. >They don't necessarily have to be "successful" - in that they get adopted - >but they have to be seen as competent and innovative. What an interesting idea! Could we really do this? Each paper would have to have an editor, and hopefully a number of contributors. The current state of the draft would have to be accessible to all somewhere. Just as in the posts about SAX2, the editor could post key sections of the draft that are being worked on, then post the final results of that section. Because this is likely to involve a lot of time, I picture these papers as being short, compelling position papers on well-defined topics. Otherwise it will be hard to get them finished. Could it really be published as coming from the XML-DEV list? Hmm... Someone else jump in here, what do you think? Tom Passin xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 Unsubscribe by posting to majordom@i... the message unsubscribe xml-dev (or) unsubscribe xml-dev your-subscribed-email@your-subscribed-address Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format