Re: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C)
Tim Bray wrote: > > And if a browser doesn't support XML+DOM, it doesn't support XML. -Tim Nice thought but isn't it more like XML+DOM(HTML), XML+DOM(SVG), XML+DOM(VRML), in other words, as far as I can tell watching the Great Children Node War, DOM can be thought of as optional as long as the application language API is complete. The SAI for VRML according to the last vote, must be standalone and must operate identically over both current encodings. So is DOM really required for XML 1.0, or is that a political position about implementations? umm... that subject line looks sort of... alternative. len xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 Unsubscribe by posting to majordom@i... the message unsubscribe xml-dev (or) unsubscribe xml-dev your-subscribed-email@your-subscribed-address Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format