[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Alternatives to the W3C

• From: "Steven Livingstone, ITS, SENM" <steven.livingstone@s...>
• To: Brandt Dainow <bd@i...>, "'XML Dev'" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 12:22:17 -0000

>and the cost of my competitors.  Look what's happening in W3C now, some of
>the XML proposals are there simply to counter-act some competitor's
>proposals.

Yes, but the point is thet W3C are there to cotrol this and produce a single
standard from the submissions.

>Microsoft is really alot like Ford was in the 20's.  For most
>people then a "car" was a Model T, and "you could have any color, so long
as
>it was black", as the saying goes. 

Are you suggesting having 20 different types of browser woudl be a good
thing?
I wouldn't want a single super-car (well, I can't drive so most people
wouldn't want me in it anyway), but I wouldn't mind a single browser made up
of everyones opinions and controlled by a consortium. Yes, I know the W3C
try to do this anyway, but I mean a commercial consortium to control NS and
MS (and anyone else i forgot).

cheers,
steven

Steven Livingstone
Glasgow, Scotland.
07771 957 280 or +447771957280

Pro XML
http://www.wrox.com/Consumer/Store/Details.asp?ISBN=1861003110
Professional Site Server 3, Wrox Press
http://www.wrox.com/Consumer/Store/Details.asp?ISBN=1861002696
Professional Site Server 3.0 Commerce Edition, Wrox Press
http://www.wrox.com/Consumer/Store/Details.asp?ISBN=1861002505


> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Brandt Dainow [SMTP:bd@i...]
> Sent:	20 January 2000 10:45
> To:	'XML Dev'
> Subject:	RE: Alternatives to the W3C
> 
> And of course, Microsoft will leap at the chance to open their source code
> to us all...
> 
> This just moves the problem into the politcal arena.  If I was the Chinese
> government, I'd want something in it which enabled me to track who you
> were
> and what you did.  I suppose the Dubai government would too, since you can
> get 5 years jail in Dubai for reading the CNN web site.
> 
> What level of encryption should it support?  US government restricts
> key-length, while Sweden believes it is a universal truth that ALL
> information should be available to everyone, while in the UK, the police
> assume encyrption is only ever needed if you're committing a crime.
> 
> Next, of course, if I'm Microsoft (or Netscape) I "support" the open
> source
> by pushing for features which enhance the appeal of my proprietary systems
> and the cost of my competitors.  Look what's happening in W3C now, some of
> the XML proposals are there simply to counter-act some competitor's
> proposals.
> 
> Trust to the chaotic anarchy of the net, if there's a need, someone will
> eventually fill it.  In the early days of any new technological revolution
> the field is always dominated by a few big boys who got there first.  But
> it
> never lasts.  Microsoft is really alot like Ford was in the 20's.  For
> most
> people then a "car" was a Model T, and "you could have any color, so long
> as
> it was black", as the saying goes.  20 years later and there were hundreds
> of models from dozens of manufacturers.
> 
> Give it time...
> 
> Brandt Dainow
> bd@i...
> Internet Etc Ltd
> http://www.internet-etc.com
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: owner-xml-dev@i... [mailto:owner-xml-dev@i...]On
> >Behalf Of
> >Don Park
> >Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2000 4:16 AM
> >To: 'XML Dev'
> >Subject: RE: Alternatives to the W3C
> >
> >
> >I think we will all benefit tremendously if there was just
> >one browser to support.  If AOL/Netscape exit the browser
> >'business', Microsoft could be 'asked' politely to place IE
> >into public domain.  A non-profit open source organization
> >could be setup to coordinate merging of Mozilla and IE into a
> >universal browser and beyond.
> >
> >Effects of such an event to W3C is somewhat difficult to guage
> >though.
> >
> >Best,
> >
> >Don Park    -   mailto:donpark@d...
> >Docuverse   -   http://www.docuverse.com
> >
> >
> >xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post,
> >mailto:xml-dev@i...
> >Archived as:
> >http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN
> >981-02-3594-1
> >Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation
> >for transfer to OASIS.
> >
> >
> 
> 
> xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
> Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN
> 981-02-3594-1
> Unsubscribe by posting to majordom@i... the message
> unsubscribe xml-dev  (or)
> unsubscribe xml-dev your-subscribed-email@your-subscribed-address
> 
> Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer
> to OASIS.

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Unsubscribe by posting to majordom@i... the message
unsubscribe xml-dev  (or)
unsubscribe xml-dev your-subscribed-email@your-subscribed-address

Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.

• Prev by Date: RE: Alternatives to the W3C
• Next by Date: RE: Alternatives to the W3C
• Previous by thread: RE: Alternatives to the W3C
• Next by thread: RE: Alternatives to the W3C
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread