Re: Simple XML conformance
John Cowan wrote: > > Peter Murray-Rust scripsit: > > > - tool threw a fatal error because <!DOCTYPE was missing > > The XML Rec does not forbid a parser to treat validation errors as fatal. But -- a missing DTD isn't a validation error. No validity constraint says "there must be a DTD". The validation errors start coming in when the content uses names that aren't declared ... first one will be the root element. It's not that subtle a point; the syntax is optional, but if you don't use it you will certainly run into validity errors. - Dave xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format