[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article

• From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• To: xml-dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 14:20:59 -0500

At 08:05 PM 1/17/00 +0100, =?windows-1252?Q?Aleksi_Niemel=E4?= wrote:
>> Become an invited expert. 
>
>This is probably told somewhere else, but I'm still asking. How to become an
>invited expert? Not that I'll be one ever... :)

It can happen a variety of ways. The WG chair or another participant may
know of someone's expertise on a particular topic, and suggest that the
individual be contacted and invited. 

Someone may demonstrate appropriate expertise on a lists such as these, and
be invited. 

Someone may directly contact a participate and ask to be invited -- though
such a direct route should of course be accompanied by supporting evidence
of expertise and an acknowledgement of availability to participate fully
(calls, email, face to face meetings). I don't think chairs want to be
inundated :), but of course it's possible that group members and chairs
won't always be aware of someone with skills that would compliment the group. 

Ann

---
Just Released! - HTML BY Example
Now shipping -  Mastering XML 
Also in print:  Effective Web Design: Master the Essentials

Founder, WebGeek Communications            http://www.webgeek.com
Vice President-Finance, HTML Writers Guild http://www.hwg.org
Director, HWG Online Education             http://www.hwg.org/services/classes





xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article
    • From: "Michael Champion" <Mike.Champion@s...>

• References:
  • RE: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article
    • From: Aleksi Niemelä <aleksi.niemela@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Costs of the W3C
• Next by Date: Re: W3C policy [Was: Microsoft's responce ...]
• Previous by thread: RE: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article
• Next by thread: Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread