[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article

• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2000 13:58:43 -0500

At 10:22 AM 1/15/00 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
>James Clark wrote:
>> Microsoft is right on this one.  See
>> 
>>  http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-19980210-errata#E28
>
>Hmm, errata updated (previous 2/17/1999) ... YESTERDAY!!

Wow.  That's enormous. My old copy of the errata was 7K, and this is 31K.

As much as I appreciate that the W3C is busy, getting this out a lot
earlier would have been useful, to say the least.  A lot of the dates on
these are _very_ old.

Simon St.Laurent
XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed.
Building XML Applications
Inside XML DTDs: Scientific and Technical
Cookies / Sharing Bandwidth
http://www.simonstl.com

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.

• References:
  • Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>
  • Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article
    • From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
  • Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Great controversies of XML
• Next by Date: Re: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form)
• Previous by thread: Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article
• Next by thread: Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread