[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Introduction

• From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 00:10:03 +0000

At 02:25 PM 1/30/00 -0800, Charles Wiltgen wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I'm a newbie on XML Dev,

We are delighted to have new members on XML-DEV. Just to reassure any
newbies, if you find some of the current discussions are difficult to
understand, don't give up! I was in your position a few years ago [although
I still find some of the stuff hard!].

> here because I've been pushing XML as a standard
>way of representing settings, annotations, etc. in a product called Media
>Cleaner Pro <http://www.terran.com/> (which I'm the product manager for).
>
>I know more about XML than anyone at our company, which is too say that I
>know almost nothing about XML compared to most of the folks on this list.
>When you see stupid questions from me, please be patient -- my goal is
>purely to Do The Right Thing.   :^)

I have asked some stupid questions in my time! The main thing is to try to
do sufficient initial reading/browsing, but you will always get a courteous
answer from someone. [This is a very helpful community]. And some of the
questions are not as simple as they may look :-). 


>
>Naturally, we're working on an XML parser.  We've started writing one from
>scratch, but I was wondering if there's something out there that we can use
>as a good starting point for our commercial, cross-platform product?

There are a huge number of parsers. Unless you actually enjoy writing
parsers (and some people do) I would strongly suggest you use one of them.
If you *do* write a parser, you will need to understand XML V1.0 *very*
well. It's not easy reading. I have just written a book review in which I
liken the spec to a parliamentary act - precise, concise and generating
huge amounts of discussion. There are many hundreds of conformance tests
which your parser needs to be measured against.

There are GPL or similar offerings in C++, Java, perl, Python, etc. and
they have been tested by tens of thousands of people. That would be my
first thought, even in a commercial product. 

	Best wishes

	P.


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Please note: New list subscriptions and unsubscriptions
are  now ***CLOSED*** in preparation for list transfer to OASIS.

• References:
  • Re: xml:lang: Am I doing more work than I need to be?
    • From: "Christopher R. Maden" <crism@e...>
  • Introduction
    • From: Charles Wiltgen <charles@w...>

• Prev by Date: Introduction
• Next by Date: Re: ANN: SAX2-beta (2000-01-28)
• Previous by thread: Introduction
• Next by thread: Re: Introduction
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread