let's get back to work...
Hello! I am not sure if I missed the final conclusion of the SAX2 interning question in the flood of the browser wars messages. As far as I remember, some people were arguing against interning that it might be a huge overherad for filters, already getting string objects from their source. If there has been no consensus yet, I would like to suggest that: 1. no parser is forced to intern elment name / element prefix strings 2. a SAX2 parser can be queried if it does string interning 3. all parsers intern namespaceURIs to avoid the null.equals (...) problem. Namespace interning should be cheap since an XML document normally does not contain tons of Namespace declarations and should also pay off quickly since namespace URI tend to be long strings. Best regards Stefan Haustein -- SAX-based access to WBXML and WML: www.trantor.de/wbxml XML pull parser: www.trantor.de/xml xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 Unsubscribe by posting to majordom@i... the message unsubscribe xml-dev (or) unsubscribe xml-dev your-subscribed-email@your-subscribed-address Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format