[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article

• From: Paul Tchistopolskii <paul@q...>
• To: xml-dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 10:46:30 -0800

----- Original Message -----
From: Simon St.Laurent <simonstl@s...>


> At 12:00 AM 1/17/00 -0500, Didier PH Martin wrote:
> >Again, I've managed our membership to the W3C starting on the most
> >shoe-string of budgets, so "it's too expensive" really rings hollow here.
> >You either commit to it, or you don't.
>
> For a lot of one-person shops, myself included, $5000/year amounts to a
> tithe (one part in ten) or much worse.  Perhaps if I felt a deep religious
> commitment to the Web, I'd be willing to contribute at this level, but I've
> had a hard enough time finding the $250 for OASIS.

<http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Prospectus/Joining>
There are two classes of membership: Full and Affiliate. The annual fee for Full Members
is $US 50,000. The annual fee for Affiliate Members is $US 5,000. There are no differences
in Member benefits between the two classes of membership. All new Members must commit to a
three-year initial term of membership. After that, membership renews annually.
</http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Prospectus/Joining>

I think it says that  3 * 5 =  $15.000.

Rgds.Paul.

PS. Ah, does not matter, does not matter ...
James Clark is still there.




xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article
    • From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
  • Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • RE: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
  • RE: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: tricky XHTML 1.0 namespace question
• Next by Date: Re: The DOM: the realist and the implementer
• Previous by thread: Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article
• Next by thread: Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread