[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Great controversies of XML

• From: Steven Champeon <schampeo@h...>
• To: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 18:18:49 -0500 (EST)

On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, Tim Bray wrote:
> >6. Internal Subsets
> 
> Shouldn't that just be 6. DTDs?

Or, "SGML DTDs vs. Schemae"?

Steve


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Great controversies of XML
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>

• References:
  • Re: Great controversies of XML
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Great controversies of XML
• Next by Date: Re: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form)
• Previous by thread: Re: Great controversies of XML
• Next by thread: Re: Great controversies of XML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread