[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: SAX2: Which license?

• From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2000 10:29:30 -0800

John Cowan wrote:
> 
> I recommend one of the following licenses:
> 
>         ...
>         David Brownell's license + GPL (not yet officially OSI-compliant,
>                 similar to QPL + GPL, specifically designed for Java)

Correction -- it _is_ OSI compliant, to the extent that phrase
means anything.

QPL (on which it's based) is compliant, and the main change just
prevents folk from changing my interfaces without my say-so.  If
you want to make such changes, you create another package name.
(That's the same answer the latest DOM specs use.)

- Dave

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: SAX2: Which license?
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>

• Prev by Date: Re: document generation
• Next by Date: Re: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form
• Previous by thread: Re: SAX2: Which license?
• Next by thread: Re: SAX2: Which license?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread