[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Further work on Xlink

• From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>
• To: "'XML Dev'" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 17:54:52 +0000

At 06:40 AM 1/24/00 -0500, Didier PH Martin wrote:

[.. call for discussion on Xlink ...]

I am pleased to see a discussion of Xlink resurfacing on XML-DEV. Xlink was
in fact meant to be the second in the family of XML protocols (before
XML-style == "XSL"). There have been previous discussions and I, for one,
found EliotK's
postings(http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/9705/0098.htm and
thereabouts) extremely useful.

Xlink has taken the community longer than was anticipated, and I think it
will be very valuable to have implementations. Eliot points out that Xlink
can serve more than one function (and I think the discussion of hierarchy
confirms this - some people use links for structure and others for
traversal.) This makes generic implementations difficult. However I think
we are all extremely grateful to the authors of tools for implementing SAX,
XSL, DOM, XMLSchemas and so forth because they allow many of use to really
understand and start using these specifications in a communal way. Does
this seem possible with Xlink?

	P.


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Unsubscribe by posting to majordom@i... the message
unsubscribe xml-dev  (or)
unsubscribe xml-dev your-subscribed-email@your-subscribed-address

Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Further work on Xlink
    • From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>

• References:
  • Further work on Xlink
    • From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Arrgh! - FW: Call for unifying and clarifying XML 1.0, DOM, XPATH, and XML Infoset
• Next by Date: RE: Further work on Xlink
• Previous by thread: RE: Further work on Xlink
• Next by thread: RE: Further work on Xlink
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread