Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
At 08:40 21/12/99 +0100, you wrote: >>>>>> roddey@u...: > >> John is absolutely correct. It *must* be wchar_t if its going to be >> a fixed thing. > >Please note that John was advocating std::wstring, rather than >std::wchar_t*. Er, sort of. I _do_ advocate std::wstring, but that's independent of the point I was making here. I can live with wchar_t* if the consensus is that std::wstring is either too slow or too poorly supported. What I'd find difficult is a typedef SAXChar which could be "unsigned short", because that would be a real bore to code to. std::basic_string<SAXChar> would be just as bad. -- Cheers, John xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; unsubscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format