[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Alternatives to the W3C

• From: Vilya Harvey <vilya@n...>
• To: "'XML Dev'" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 17:32:43 +0000

Didier PH Martin wrote:
>
> Statistics from: http://www.cen.uiuc.edu/bstats/latest.html
>  Browser Flavors                  Hosts     %
>  --------------------------------------------
>   1. Microsoft                     7245  60.3
>   2. Netscape                      4332  36.1
>   3. other                          436   3.6
> Microsoft Explorer Versions
>  Version                     MSIE Hosts     %
>  --------------------------------------------
>   1. v5                            4581  63.2
>   2. v4                            2330  32.2
>   3. v3                             213   2.9
>   4. v2                             116   1.6
>   5. other                            5    .1
> 
> Didier replies:
> Sounds like there is an already  good number of XML aware browsers in
> the field.

Just a quick cautionary note: read the disclaimers at the above URL and
take the figures with a grain of salt. There are a number of factors which
could contribute to their being skewed...

Vil.
-- 
Vilya Harvey  <vilya@n...>    Wilkinson House  Mob: +44  961 106 505
Computational Mathematics Group   Jordan Hill Road   Wk: +44 1865 511 245
NAG Limited                    Oxford  UK  OX2 8DR  Fax: +44 1865 311 205

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Unsubscribe by posting to majordom@i... the message
unsubscribe xml-dev  (or)
unsubscribe xml-dev your-subscribed-email@your-subscribed-address

Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.

• References:
  • RE: Alternatives to the W3C
    • From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Alternatives to the W3C
• Next by Date: RE: Extensible browsers
• Previous by thread: RE: Alternatives to the W3C
• Next by thread: RE: Alternatives to the W3C
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread