[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: String interning

• From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
• To: Miles Sabin <msabin@c...>
• Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 17:40:30 -0500

Miles Sabin wrote:

> David Megginson wrote,
> > For comparison, I just whipped up a Java class to compare two
> > (non-equal) Strings 10,000,000 times.  Here are the USER
> > timings:
> >
> > No comparisons (startup overhead): 0.67 seconds
> > Compare with ==:                   0.94 seconds (=0.2 seconds)
> > Compare with equals():             8.00 seconds (=7.33 seconds)
> >
> > That's a very significant performance difference.
>
> It's also a completely meaningless one unless we can see the
> code and know something about the platform you're running on.
> I'd be quite surprised if there was that much margin with a
> Sun 1.2 JDK and Hotspot on Solaris or Win32.

You will get similiar results on every platform you test it on unless the JVM authors
figure out a way to make testing for object identity more expensive than dynamic method
invocation. Doing that would take some real talent (-:

Regards,

Tyler


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.

• References:
  • RE: String interning
    • From: Miles Sabin <msabin@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form)
• Next by Date: Re: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form)
• Previous by thread: RE: String interning
• Next by thread: RE: String interning
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread