[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XML for 3D geometry and objects

• From: Len Bullard <cbullard@h...>
• To: Brandt Dainow <bd@i...>
• Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2000 12:16:04 -0600

Brandt Dainow wrote:
> 
> I forgot to mention that Macromedia were part of the VML proposal, so I
> guess we'll see VML in their products too.  I wonder what this'll mean for
> Shockwave & Flash.  Irrespective of performance or quality, I  don't see how
> SVG stands a chance against an MS/Macromedia alliance, they must control
> something like 80-90% of all the authoring tools.  I guess we can also
> expect HP to use VML in their printers.
> Truetype was a combined HP/MS development as a response to Adobe's
> postscript.  Are we going to see history repeat itself?

It stands a good chance.  People actually check the standardization 
before going forward.  Some also hang back waiting for stable 
implementations.  A lot depends on the value of the information 
to be marked up.  SVG will do well.  We will experiment with VML 
to get a feel for markup in graphics, then move on out with SVG 
when the timing is right.  

Considering that using markup for graphics used to be a killing 
offense, we have come a long ways.

len



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Unsubscribe by posting to majordom@i... the message
unsubscribe xml-dev  (or)
unsubscribe xml-dev your-subscribed-email@your-subscribed-address

Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.

• References:
  • RE: XML for 3D geometry and objects
    • From: "Brandt Dainow" <bd@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C)
• Next by Date: Re: Alternatives to the W3C
• Previous by thread: RE: XML for 3D geometry and objects
• Next by thread: RE: XML for 3D geometry and objects
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread