RE: Clearer W3C Specs (was Re: XML Information Set is seeding impenetrab
>This posting (and a diatribe against the Schema draft that I saw today) >reminded me to bring this issue to my AC Rep's attention. Can >anyone suggest other concrete proposals for improving the situation? Sure. How about releasing a more interactive form of the spec that allows the reader to: 1. rate individual paragraph for clarity 2. post annotations If W3C can't afford do this themselves, we can just use Third Voice or something like it for this. If Third Voice's platform restrictions is a problem, we can just leave W3C documents as they are and create a value-added version at at different site that allows annotation and rating. We spend most of our time talking about new technologies and many of us build'em but, goddammit, lets use some! Best, Don Park - mailto:donpark@d... Docuverse - http://www.docuverse.com xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 Unsubscribe by posting to majordom@i... the message unsubscribe xml-dev (or) unsubscribe xml-dev your-subscribed-email@your-subscribed-address Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format