[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Clearer W3C Specs (was Re: XML Information Set is seeding impenetrab

• From: "Don Park" <donpark@d...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 13:20:02 -0800

>This posting (and a diatribe against the Schema draft that I saw today)
>reminded me to bring this issue to my AC Rep's attention. Can
>anyone suggest other concrete proposals for improving the situation?

Sure.  How about releasing a more interactive form of the spec that
allows the reader to:

  1. rate individual paragraph for clarity
  2. post annotations

If W3C can't afford do this themselves, we can just use Third Voice
or something like it for this.  If Third Voice's platform restrictions
is a problem, we can just leave W3C documents as they are and create a
value-added version at at different site that allows annotation and
rating.

We spend most of our time talking about new technologies and many of us
build'em but, goddammit, lets use some!

Best,

Don Park    -   mailto:donpark@d...
Docuverse   -   http://www.docuverse.com


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Unsubscribe by posting to majordom@i... the message
unsubscribe xml-dev  (or)
unsubscribe xml-dev your-subscribed-email@your-subscribed-address

Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.

• References:
  • Clearer W3C Specs (was Re: XML Information Set is seeding impenetrable language; reconsider?)
    • From: "Michael Champion" <Mike.Champion@s...>

• Prev by Date: Clearer W3C Specs (was Re: XML Information Set is seeding impenetrable language; reconsider?)
• Next by Date: RE: XML for 3D geometry and objects
• Previous by thread: Clearer W3C Specs (was Re: XML Information Set is seeding impenetrable language; reconsider?)
• Next by thread: Re: Clearer W3C Specs (was Re: XML Information Set is seeding impenetrable language; reconsider?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread