Re: Alternatives to the W3C
Ann Navarro wrote: > > User interface design is now based on the convenience for the programmer? If you want it to work as often as possible, yes. It isn't as Tim suggests that they vote for the webInterface because it is the best one, it is because it is the one with the most content. If they are given a more reliable system, then they discover what the Mac users have always enjoyed, higher productivity. For the scripter (any scripter) to be productive, the components must work the same way. Closed systems make that affordable. That is the engineers voting with their feet. No one here thinks the competitors are going away, but the numbers favor the vendor with the best MTBF over a range of well-specified tests. len xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format