[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Alternatives to the W3C

• From: Len Bullard <cbullard@h...>
• To: Sean McGrath <digitome@i...>
• Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 11:29:42 -0600

Sean McGrath wrote:
> 
> Amen. I see an increasing number of innovative Web apps in which
> the browser is the "viewer" as distinct from the app that is
> doing the real work.
> 
> I think it is interesting to ponder why this is so.
> My (controversial of course) view on this
> is that the Web client-side programming model of an
> embedded, sand-boxed, buggy,
> antithesis-of-a-text-processing-language has finally
> run its course.

Architecturally, it doesn't always make sense to make HTML the 
outer language layer or have a web browser be the framework.  
http and other transports should be just services available to 
any app.  The document centric/flow object model isn't the 
only way to do this.  Sometimes it makes sense; in other 
cases, it is just baggage.

len



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.

• References:
  • Re: Alternatives to the W3C
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: Alternatives to the W3C
    • From: Sean McGrath <digitome@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Alternatives to browsers (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C)
• Next by Date: Re: Alternatives to browsers (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C)
• Previous by thread: Re: Alternatives to browsers (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C)
• Next by thread: RE: Alternatives to the W3C
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread