[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: SAX2: pull interface

  • From: "Clark C. Evans" <clark.evans@m...>
  • To: David Megginson <david@m...>
  • Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 13:41:29 -0500 (EST)

push interface
On Tue, 18 Jan 2000, David Megginson wrote:
> There are two different ways that an event-based interface can work:
> the event supplier can push events out to the consumer, or the
> consumer can pull events from the supplier.

Yes.  I very much like the push interface for branches 
(elements), however, a pull interface for the leaf
content would be extremely useful, and perhaps more
efficient.  See the Character Tugging post.

I think SAX would be far improved if it continued 
to push elements, but allowed for leaf characters
to be pulled.

> SAX is very much a push interface, but some people have asked if it
> might be possible to add optional support for pull, so that you can do
> something like
> 
>   Event e = xmlReader.nextEvent();

Pull interfaces are great for reading, and push
interfaces are great for writing.  You can go
from pull to push without problem; however going
from push to pull requires extra buffering, novel
communication or multi-threading.

Thus, a pull interface is not ideal for a multi
stage process; due to the push->pull conversion
between each stage.  Of course, receiving push
is a bit annoying, but a nested object handler
can transparently mitigate this concern.

However, you can allow for "pull" at the leaves of 
a "push" with little to no effort.  In fact, it
may be more efficient...


> Questions
> ---------
> 
> 1. Is this adequate for the people who want pull?  I really don't want 
>    to define a separate object for each event type (especially when we 
>    allow arbitrary extension handlers).

I'd just like leaf content to be pulled... the extension handler
seemed like a complicated solution for a simple problem.

> 2. Is it OK that a single call to nextEvent() might generate two or
>    three events in some cases?
> 
> 3. Would any of the parser writers out there want to support this?


What is better is Paul Miller's nested handler idea, 
(XMLIO) letting a ContentHandler return a sub-handler to 
receive all of the child events for a given element.

   ContentHandler beginElement(...)

Combined with a CharTug, this works beautyfully...
I have a SML interface and parser which works
this way.  It's pretty.

Clark


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.



PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.