[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: [OT] Re: Geoworks and their patent

• From: Philip Nye <philipnye@f...>
• To: "XML Developers' List" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 23:05:00 +0000

Tyler Baker wrote:

> Well, what about companies in the business of patenting things which never have a solid
> implementation behind the ideas as well as never ever producing a mature product from
> those ideas.

It is interesting that under British law, if a patent holder is not
exploiting their patent, a court can force them to licence it - although
the licence terms would be dictated by the court and might not be
acceptable to either party.

This would not apply to Geoworks whose patent is not British and who are
obviously intending to licence it anyway.

Philip Nye
-- 
Engineering Arts
mailto:philipnye@f...

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Unsubscribe by posting to majordom@i... the message
unsubscribe xml-dev  (or)
unsubscribe xml-dev your-subscribed-email@your-subscribed-address

Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [OT] Re: Geoworks and their patent
    • From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>

• References:
  • RE: [OT] Re: Geoworks and their patent
    • From: Bill dehOra <Wdehora@c...>
  • Re: [OT] Re: Geoworks and their patent
    • From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Oracle & Z39.50- PL/SQL or Java gizmo?
• Next by Date: Getting "<" and "&" sign in the HTML document
• Previous by thread: Re: [OT] Re: Geoworks and their patent
• Next by thread: Re: [OT] Re: Geoworks and their patent
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread