[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: SAX2: pull interface

• From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: 20 Jan 2000 08:57:25 -0500

Steinar Bang <sb@m...> writes:

> >>>>> David Megginson <david@m...>:
> 
> > Personally, I like recursive-descent a lot (and probably wouldn't
> > have finished writing the original AElfred parser otherwise).  Miles
> > guesses correctly that SAX1 was push to accommodate existing
> > parsers.
> 
> Doesn't recursive descent parsers have a problem with partial input
> received from the net?  Don't you have to buffer up the entire file
> before you start parsing?

Not per se, but most RD parsers will block waiting for the rest of the
input rather than returning control to the caller.  That's not a
problem with multiple threads, but it's sometimes very inconvenient in 
a single-threaded environment.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Unsubscribe by posting to majordom@i... the message
unsubscribe xml-dev  (or)
unsubscribe xml-dev your-subscribed-email@your-subscribed-address

Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.

• References:
  • RE: SAX2: pull interface
    • From: Miles Sabin <msabin@c...>
  • Re: SAX2: pull interface
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>
  • Re: SAX2: pull interface
    • From: Steinar Bang <sb@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Generating Drop Down HTML tags with XSL
• Next by Date: Re: XML Schema --> C++
• Previous by thread: Re: SAX2: pull interface
• Next by thread: RE: Alternatives to browsers (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread