Re: Alternatives to the W3C
At 11:23 AM 1/17/00 -0800, David Brownell wrote: >> foul! FO spec is unfinished. > >Actually, perhaps that means it's right on the mark. It's >better to have code (such as FOP? ;-) implementing drafts, >and turning up bugs therein, than to wait till any sort of >"Candidate REC" stage to start such work. And I'm happy to report that there is an implementation in place, and being madly extended as we write, in the Apache project (see http://xml.apache.org). Any others? -Tim xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format