[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

FW: Arrgh! - FW: Call for unifying and clarifying XML 1.0, DOM, XPATH, a

  • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • To: XML-Dev Mailing list <xml-dev@i...>
  • Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 12:07:01 -0500

xml dom xpath
[This is not my own posting - I'm forwarding this for someone who's stuck
off the list until the OASIS transfer is complete.]

From: Kevin Williams <Kevin.Williams@u...>

>Here are the issues I have with Nils' comments:
>1. The Infoset is not the same as the DOM. The Infoset does not imply a tree
>structure. The Infoset should never imply a tree structure, as it's intended
>to describe the behavior of non-node-oriented processors such as SAX.
>2. Attributes are different than other nodes. An attribute by itself is
>meaningless - it needs to be associated with an element. Attributes are
>unordered. I believe the W3C made the right call by making attributes not
>children of the elements with which they are associated.
>3. The term "information item" is a necessary one because of the overuse of
>other synonyms (such as element, attribute, and so on) in the DOM
>specifications. Information items are none of these.
>4. Nils appears to be obsessed with terminology in the XML 1.0
>specification, which is significantly out of date at this point. The newer
>drafts should be taken as the "official" W3C position - there's just not
>anyone providing errata to the original document to keep it in line. For
>example, the current way of thinking says that there's a Document node,
>which must have exactly one Element child node. XML 1.0 says something
>slightly different, but that's not important.
>While I agree that the W3C specifications can go a little heavy on the
>jargon, I think that the way the specifications are constructed is necessary
>and correct. The last thing we need is to see all of these different specs
>munged together into one "unified" specification that limits the available
>functionality of XML as it exists today. Perhaps Nils would be happier with
>SML, with no pesky attributes to worry about...
>- Kevin
>Kevin Williams
>Ultraprise Corporation (www.ultraprise.com)
>Co-author, _Professional XML_ (Wrox Press)

Simon St.Laurent
XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed.
Building XML Applications
Inside XML DTDs: Scientific and Technical
Cookies / Sharing Bandwidth

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Unsubscribe by posting to majordom@i... the message
unsubscribe xml-dev  (or)
unsubscribe xml-dev your-subscribed-email@your-subscribed-address

Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.


Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
First Name
Last Name
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.

Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.