Re: Alternatives to the W3C
Ann Navarro wrote: > > There's nothing in IE 5 functionality that is so compelling to *content* > that it should be "required" to use. > Your conclusions are highly debatable. But the barriers aren't artificial. Reliability is why Dave wants that to happen. Remove the need to write for multiple frameworks, and the reliability goes up. Reliability numbers are a characteristic of the component. Most of us think about books still and XML does that fine. Some of us now have to think about execution models for real time entertainment applications. In a real time system, the execution model is the dominant characteristic of the specified contract. Behavioral fidelity. len xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format