RE: String interning
Toby Speight wrote, > This also allows consumers to push a SAX interner (a filter) > onto the producer, so that all output from the filter is > interned. This needs to be done just once, at setup time, so > no other part of the consumer is affected. And there's no > overhead added if the producer generates interned names. > > boolean namesAreInterned = > xmlReader.getFeature > ("http://xml.org/sax/features/interned-names"); > > if (namesAreInterned) ^^^? > xmlReader = new SAXInterner(xmlReader); > > // The 'interned-names' feature will always be true at this > // point. > > // Now add the handlers... This is the nicest solution yet ... if you're handlers depend on String.intern() and the parser doesn't guarantee that, then slip an intern'ing adapter around the parser. But shouldn't the marked line read, if (!namesAreInterned) xmlReader = new SAXInterner(xmlReader); Cheers, Miles -- Miles Sabin Cromwell Media Internet Systems Architect 5/6 Glenthorne Mews +44 (0)20 8817 4030 London, W6 0LJ, England msabin@c... http://www.cromwellmedia.com/ xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format