RE: [RE: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form]
Miles Sabin <msabin@c...> wrote: >I don't think dropping 'extends Parser' should impact on this >in any really significant way. Intially I would expect almost >all parsers to implement both XMLReader _and_ Parser for SAX1 >compatibility, so you'd have a fair breathing space during >which casting from the former to the latter would be safe. >Actually, one of my worries is that having XMLReader extend >a deprecated interface will cause javac/jikes/javadoc to spit >out warnings or errors ... not a big deal, perhaps, but a bit >of a pain (I'm one of those people who habitually set the >'treat warnings as errors' flag on all my tools ;-). In addition to a wide miss on the downcast thing (as David pointed out), I also forgot about deprecation warnings across the board. Better for the clean break, new methods on my end, and I confine any deprecation (forced by my logic) to the old stuff. Now I'll confine the few synapses I apparently have running to getting my list replies in context... ;) Regards, Jim Layer ____________________________________________________________________ Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com. xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format