[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

MODERATORIAL (was: Web browsers and editors)

• From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>
• To: "XML developers' list" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 14:54:36 +0000

[MODERATORIAL. A gentle indication of good list practice follows...]

At 12:36 PM 1/25/00 +0000, Toby Speight wrote:

[... an exemplary example of how and when to change a subject line ...]

I have replied to this, and also changed the subject line to reflect the
content of *this* message :-)

Note that I have:
	- removed the "(was Alternatives... suffix)"
	- inserted a (was: ...) to show whence this came
	- added a descriptive subject
	- replied *only* to the list, not to the author

Anyone else who wishes to reply to a posting with a subject line containing
one-or-more instances of "Alternatives to the W3C" should consider whether
their reply now fits the "Web browsers and editors" theme better.

The reason I have revitalised this is that Henry and I want to try to
analyse the list content and structure so that we can normalise and
hyperlink the content of XML-DEV. Removing spurious material and
encouraging good subject lines will be helpful in this process.

	P.

[BTW some will have noticed that the hypermailer is capable of time travel
(the MCMLXX bug). This is not present in the original mail, I think.]

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Unsubscribe by posting to majordom@i... the message
unsubscribe xml-dev  (or)
unsubscribe xml-dev your-subscribed-email@your-subscribed-address

Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.

• References:
  • Web browsers and editors (was: Alternatives to the W3C)
    • From: Toby Speight <Toby.Speight@s...>

• Prev by Date: EDITORIAL
• Next by Date: Re: [OT] Re: Geoworks and their patent
• Previous by thread: Web browsers and editors (was: Alternatives to the W3C)
• Next by thread: Politics? baaah no, Feedback on peer's work? yeah!
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread