Re: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form
David Megginson wrote: > > > > That's a good question -- should SAX2 require that all names and > > > Namespace URIs be interned (i.e. == to the results of > > > java.lang.String.intern)? > > I don't know if there's a lot of benefit in requiring this, though -- > it's just a trial balloon right now. I almost hesitate to suggest exposing it as a feature, but that may be the right way to go. Apps depending on "==" and "!=" for fast comparisons could just reject parsers that don't do it, and others wouldn't care. I can't see any parser bothering to make that feature state mutable -- the cost is writing the code, not running it. - Dave xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format