[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: SAX/C++ vs. SAX2

• From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@g...>
• To: XMLDev list <xml-dev-digest@i...>
• Date: 06 Dec 1999 10:43:53 +0100

* David Megginson
|
| I'd like to hear what others think on this issue.

My feeling is that SAX2 is very important (namespaces, generalized
querying and extensibility and lexical information are all very
important to some kinds of applications), and furthermore so close to
completion that it should go before a C++ binding, which might take a
long time to complete.

The added benefit is of course that the C++ bindings for SAX 1.0 and
2.0 can be done simultaneously.

--Lars M.

 


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: SAX/C++ vs. SAX2
    • From: Vilya Harvey <vilya@n...>

• References:
  • SAX/C++ vs. SAX2
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
• Next by Date: Re: parser asynch input (Was: SAX/C++: First interface draft)
• Previous by thread: Re: SAX/C++ vs. SAX2
• Next by thread: Re: SAX/C++ vs. SAX2
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread