Re: SAX/C++ vs. SAX2
* David Megginson | | I'd like to hear what others think on this issue. My feeling is that SAX2 is very important (namespaces, generalized querying and extensibility and lexical information are all very important to some kinds of applications), and furthermore so close to completion that it should go before a C++ binding, which might take a long time to complete. The added benefit is of course that the C++ bindings for SAX 1.0 and 2.0 can be done simultaneously. --Lars M. xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; unsubscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format