Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
>>>>> roddey@u...: This statement: > ... If it were up to me, I'd say use every modern service of C++ and > those who don't have compliant C++ implementation can have a good reason to > get one. [...] conflicts with this statement: > 2) We would prefer that all data come out of the SAX interfaces as > raw wchar_t strings. This is the most flexible mechanism and does > not lock people into using any particular implementation of a string > object. It also has the highest potential performance for those > folks who never need to put it into anything more formal than a raw > array. std::basic_string<> _is_ a modern service of C++, and a pretty good one from an API point of view. Personally I say: use std::basic_string<> and death to all other string representations in C++. xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; unsubscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format