[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: About templates

• From: Leigh Dodds <ldodds@i...>
• To: Don Park <donpark@d...>, 'XML Dev' <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 11:39:09 -0000

> I am now leaning very heavily toward focusing SML on XML fragments
> so that SML data (the word 'document' is not in the SML draft spec)
> starts with the 'content' production rule of the XML spec.  No
> prolog, no misc.  SML data have zero or more elements and can be
> entirely text.

I assume you mean the following? 

[43] content ::= (element | CharData | Reference | CDSect | PI | Comment)*

So an SML data fragment is not necessarily a valid XML document 
as it can be entirely text? And so an XML processor may not be 
able to process an SML document? Is that correct?

> May your tire pressure remain constant,

And your mileage never vary :)

L.

==================================================================
    "Never Do With More, What Can Be Achieved With Less"
				---William of Occam
==================================================================
Leigh Dodds                             Eml:  ldodds@i...
ingenta ltd                             Tel:  +44 1225 826619
BUCS Building, University of Bath       Fax:  +44 1225 826283

HomePage :				 	http://www.bath.ac.uk/~ccslrd/
WebLog   :			     http://weblogs.userland.com/eclectic/
==================================================================

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: About templates
    • From: "Don Park" <donpark@d...>

• References:
  • RE: About templates
    • From: "Don Park" <donpark@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML Memory Requirements (was Re: Feeling good about SML)
• Next by Date: RE: Feeling good about SML
• Previous by thread: RE: About templates
• Next by thread: RE: About templates
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread