Re: XML Memory Requirements (was Re: Feeling good about SML)
Tim Bray wrote: > > At 09:57 AM 11/18/99 -0800, David Brownell wrote: > >The technique I used in Sun's parser may be good for many folk to steal. > >It involves using the standard Character.getType() method (which has > >access to lots of Unicode tables, and in recent JVMs uses native code > >to quickly access them) and then filtering that output by the rules in > >the XML spec. > > Fine, but the Lark technique *doesn't* require storing any Unicode > tables and thus uses an order of magnitude (probably) less memory; or > am I missing something? -T. If you're using Java, there's no incremental cost to using the tables that already exist -- that's already been paid, whether you use Lark or not. That "filtering" stuff doesn't take very much code at all. - Dave xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; unsubscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format