[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: WML vs. XHTML

• From: XMLDevGuy@a...
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Fri, 5 Nov 1999 01:31:17 EST

WML is a more advanced than HDML as it includes WMLScripting (for storing 
variables across multiple cards and access to special phone features), 
following the DTD for WML pretty much gives you everything that one needs to 
know for creating a Deck.  A Deck is also an XML Doc.  

Being an avid DHTML developer, is XHTML worth looking @ at this point?  

Also, Im assuming with XML:XSL that an implementation could be make for WML 
easily (with the exception of the events).  I wrote a WML java package a few 
months ago with simple Deck and Card classes and has worked ok, but Im very 
interested in simply dropping it for XML:XSL style.  Make sense?

- Jon

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: WML vs. XHTML
    • From: "Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@j...>
  • Re: WML vs. XHTML
    • From: Richard Lanyon <rgl@d...>

• Prev by Date: re: Re: XHTML 1.0 returned to HTML WG
• Next by Date: IBM's ElementHandler
• Previous by thread: Re: WML vs. XHTML
• Next by thread: Re: WML vs. XHTML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread