[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: XHTML 1.0 returned to HTML WG

• From: "Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@j...>
• To: "xml-dev" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 3 Nov 1999 21:58:33 -0500

Tim Bray wrote:

> Lots of people have good solid practical uses for namespaces.  Anyone who
> thinks that HTML can go forward standing alone in glorious isolation and
> never being mixed with another tag vocabulary Just Doesn't Get It.

The How, not the What, is what's contentious.  Look at this list for the last
several months.  Do we need that to hold back xHTML 1.0 for another three months
or more?

/Jelks



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: XHTML 1.0 returned to HTML WG
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>

• References:
  • RE: XHTML 1.0 returned to HTML WG
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XHTML 1.0 returned to HTML WG
• Next by Date: RE: XHTML 1.0 returned to HTML WG
• Previous by thread: Re: XHTML 1.0 returned to HTML WG
• Next by thread: RE: XHTML 1.0 returned to HTML WG
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread