[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: [SML] RE: Forget SML. We need RTSML.

• From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@g...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: 29 Nov 1999 10:45:50 +0100

* Joe Lapp
|
| I don't understand this proposal.  You can't represent structured
| data with it.  What am I missing?

A functioning irony detector?

--Lars M.


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • [SML] RE: Forget SML. We need RTSML.
    • From: Joe Lapp <jlapp@w...>

• Prev by Date: Re: A call for reason
• Next by Date: Re: Fw: [SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?
• Previous by thread: [SML] RE: Forget SML. We need RTSML.
• Next by thread: About SML data model and implication for RDBMS to SML mapping
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread