[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Why no ']]>' in CharData?

• From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Sun, 28 Nov 1999 14:53:58 -0500 (EST)

Don Park scripsit:

> Not too many folks noticed it but I removed the hex numerical character
> references in the preliminary EBNF.  I prefer hex but didn't like the
> extra 'x' to get there.  I can go with either hex or decimal but not
> both.

Go with hex only, as Unicode documents all characters in hex only.
But keep the x for cheap backward compatibility.

-- 
John Cowan                                   cowan@c...
       I am a member of a civilization. --David Brin

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • RE: Why no ']]>' in CharData?
    • From: "Don Park" <donpark@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: [SML] Preliminary EBNF v0.2
• Next by Date: Re: Entities - dec, hex, or both?
• Previous by thread: RE: Why no ']]>' in CharData?
• Next by thread: Re: Why no ']]>' in CharData?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread