|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] XML Conversion
Hello,
I'm a newbie in XML Conversion and we're being tasked to transform a
plain text file into XML. We've done this in SGML before and learned
also that XML is actually Web-enabled SGML. However, we noticed that
the extensive use of taggings (elements) in XML has slowed down our
productivity considerably.
Now my question is: is it really necessary to tag all items, say, in a
bibliographic reference, e.g.
XML Specs now:
<cite><title>The Origin of Species</title>, <author>Darwin</author>
<pages>pp. 6-10</pages> <pubinfo><pub>Oxford University Press</pub>,
<year>1901</year></pubinfo></cite>
SGML Specs before:
<cite>The origin of Species, Darwin, pp. 6-10, Oxford University
Press, 1901.</cite>
Links were provided to citerefs within the document.
What's the difference between the two, the rationale behind use of
extensive tags in XML, and when are decisions going to be made that
such data should or should not be tagged?
Thank you all for giving these some thoughts.
Regards,
Jess Nemis
jess_nemis@i...
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








