[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Are you sure the XML decl shouldnt be a PI ? :)

• From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 09:19:10 -0500 (EST)

Richard Anderson writes:

 > BTW, I noticed that the XML recs in XML have these two entities:
 > 
 > <!ENTITY xmlpio "'&lt;?xml'">
 > <!ENTITY pic    "'?>'">
 > 
 > XML Pi Open, XML Pi Close maybe ? 

That may well be the way that the particular XML author thought of
them; they may also be relics from earlier drafts, before the
committee decided that the declaration was not a PI.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: Separating documents in a stream
    • From: Eric Bohlman <ebohlman@n...>
  • Is the XML decl a PI ?
    • From: "Richard Anderson" <rja@a...>
  • The XML decl is not a PI (especially in SAX)
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>
  • Are you sure the XML decl shouldnt be a PI ? :)
    • From: "Richard Anderson" <rja@a...>
  • Re: Are you sure the XML decl shouldnt be a PI ? :)
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>
  • Re: Are you sure the XML decl shouldnt be a PI ? :)
    • From: "Richard Anderson" <rja@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Feeling good about SML
• Next by Date: Re: documenting schemas/DTDs
• Previous by thread: Re: Are you sure the XML decl shouldnt be a PI ? :)
• Next by thread: HERE's why the world needs a simpler XML! [was Re: The XML decl is not a PI (especially in SAX)]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread