[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Parser compliance

  • From: Marcus Carr <mrc@a...>
  • To: xml-dev@i...
  • Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 14:54:22 +1100

Re: Parser compliance

David Megginson wrote:

> The DTD has two small but important roles in system implementation: as
> a partial set of structural validation rules and as a partial schema
> for guided authoring (it's nearly always supplemented in both cases).

Agreed.

> Unfortunately, SGML consultancies who knew mainly just DTDS and FOSIs
> were substituting DTD design for data analysis, domain modelling,
> system design, user interface design, and lots of other things for
> which DTDs are woefully inadequate.

Also agreed. However very few SGML people would have used a DTD in domain modelling, system
design or user interface design, so inadequacies in those areas equal SGML's inability to
deliver milk to your doorstep. :-) I don't deny for a second that the ability to base systems
on XML without DTDs is an extremely good thing - it will almost surely make XML the defining
force in computing. The fact remains though that for documents that were created against a
DTD, it is incorrect to declare that it is a myth that validation can tell you what's wrong
with your XML. Depending on the structure (tiny, all empty elements) and the data (must be
tokens from attribute lists), validation may be a perfectly adequate method of uncovering
problems. The further you move from this model, the more you need to supplement the
information availabe from the DTD, as you pointed out above.

> DTDs should have been just part of the solution, not *the* solution.

I still don't see what the other part should have been. It still sounds as though there was
some sort of willful conspiracy or ignorance, but it appears to be based on the fact that we
can do so much more now, so we should have known better then.

> In any case, my message was an explanation of why DTDs have been so
> heavily hyped, not an attack on the idea of DTDs themselves.  DTDs
> were the great Golden Hammer of the SGML consulting world.

Yes, when nails were the only thing that held houses together.


--
Regards,

Marcus Carr                      email:  mrc@a...
___________________________________________________________________
Allette Systems (Australia)      www:    http://www.allette.com.au
___________________________________________________________________
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler."
       - Einstein



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)



PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.