Re: XHTML 1.0 returned to HTML WG
David Brownell <david-b@p...> writes: > > Curt Arnold sez: > > > > > Namespace free XHTML would be fine with me. > > Although I certainly suggested that at one point, I think _one_ is the > preferable outcome, and the motivation for _zero_ namespaces would only > have been to get XHTML out quicker than it appears can now happen. Further to this point, the members' responses to the director are confidential -- even those of us on W3C committees don't get to see them -- but from what some members have told me unofficially, an XHTML spec with zero Namespaces will not be any more successful than an XHTML spec with three. All the best, David -- David Megginson david@m... http://www.megginson.com/ xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; unsubscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format