[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: A call for reason

• From: "Don Park" <donpark@d...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Sun, 28 Nov 1999 23:05:16 -0800

>I'm learning through the grapevine that some people of 
>influence are opposed to the SML effort.

As the person who started the SML effort, I have this to
say to them:

If you have concerns, please voice them and suggest ways
to minimize your concerns.  Let us work together to
prevent unnecessary conflicts.

Just remember that not all things are controllable and
not all people can be influenced.  Killing all the
butterflies in Peking will not rid Kansas of tornadoes.
Let the butterfly be and hope it drops dead on its own
in the winter.

Best,

Don Park    -   mailto:donpark@d...
Docuverse   -   http://www.docuverse.com


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: A call for reason
    • From: Len Bullard <cbullard@h...>

• References:
  • A call for reason
    • From: Joe Lapp <jlapp@w...>

• Prev by Date: RE: [SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?
• Next by Date: Fw: [SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?
• Previous by thread: RE: A call for reason
• Next by thread: Re: A call for reason
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread