Re: RDF, again
Paul Prescod <paul@p...> writes: > Speaking on behalf of the devil, I'd say that in one week we could > define (or just find) an S-expression-like language with none of these > weaknesses and in less time we could write a parser for it. It could > have "XML element" as a primary data type for embedded XML and could > also be embedded IN XML. People on this list keep mentioning S-expressions. I'm not sure if you are talking about lispish syntax in general, or some more precisely defined language? In the latter case, are you speaking about the language defined at http://theory.lcs.mit.edu/~rivest/sexp.html? It is about one order of magnitude easier to parse than XML. The only application of it that I know of is SPKI (Simple Public Key Infrastructure). /Niels xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; unsubscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format