[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: external parsed entites (was: A unique ID question ?)

• From: Len Bullard <cbullard@h...>
• To: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Tue, 09 Nov 1999 20:19:22 -0600

Tim Bray wrote:
> 
> At 06:30 PM 11/9/99 -0600, Len Bullard wrote:
> >We can't bag the cat once it is in the alley
> >unless we are faster than the cat, or know where it sleeps.  In either
> >case, we will have a mad cat when we take it out of the bag.
> 
> I enjoyed reading that but I have *no* idea what you mean, Len... -T

External parsed entities are a done deal for XML 1.0.  
But hey, just a version number, right?  We get to 
have this fight again. :-)

If you and eliot truly think they are bogus and a 
screwup to use, sounds like an issue to me.  

How do subdocs fix this problem, Eliot?  Or 
better, what problems do subdocs fix for markup systems?

len



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: external parsed entites (was: A unique ID question ?)
    • From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@C...>
  • Re: external parsed entites (was: A unique ID question ?)
    • From: "W. Eliot Kimber" <eliot@i...>

• References:
  • Re: external parsed entites (was: A unique ID question ?)
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Schemas coming of age: use them
• Next by Date: Re: Schemas coming of age: use them
• Previous by thread: Re: external parsed entites (was: A unique ID question ?)
• Next by thread: Re: external parsed entites (was: A unique ID question ?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread