|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Why do we write standards?
Simon St.Laurent wrote: > > We've got the core set. Why not let users experiment with that basic set > of tools before we try to slap them in straitjackets? I hear people on > this list insisting on the need for constraints, for fixed structures, for > all that stuff that made sense when computers were (relatively) slow and > stupid and data structures were hard to convert from one form to another. Make schemas time-dynamic systems and enable the namespace to reflect that volatility and variant. Shouldn't be that hard if you agree that registries are just records of authority and that a given ROA can be said to dominate discourse within the process space. The reason I originally suggested using a time model from a music standard for enterprise management is that it contains an asynchronous model of gestures for synchronizing a performance. The most obvious problem of XML-centric, namespace authorities is the same as any other set of related standards: discovering redundancy and differentiating it from overlapping dimensional members. len xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; unsubscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








